Citations
2012 PLD 122 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN MUHAMMAD RASOOL VS STATE
Jurisdiction under ATA, 1997 depends on the offence’s link to terrorism, while JJSO, 2000 focuses on the offender’s age.
2014 PCRLJ 374 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT NADEEM VS STATE
Evidence is assessed by the same standard under ATA and regular law; contradictions in witness statements undermine credibility.
PCRLJ 2007 LAHORE 1097
Accused were rightly identified and ransom proven; recoveries confirmed guilt, making compromise invalid—offence under S.7(e) ATA upheld.
Acts causing public fear fall under ATA jurisdiction per its Third Schedule; transfer to regular court rightly denied.
PLD 2014 SC 383
Compromise accepted for murder under S.302(b) PPC, but not for terrorism under S.7 ATA; death sentence converted to life imprisonment.
2020 SCMR 677
In a cross-version case with injuries on both sides, guilt was uncertain; accused were granted bail under S.497(2) Cr.P.C.
2020 SCMR 687 SUPREME-COURT
FSL report not put to accused under S.342 Cr.P.C.; evidence invalid for conviction—appeal allowed, accused acquitted.
2019 Y L R 1426 [SINDH]
Bail on medical grounds requires illness untreatable in jail needing specialized care; conditions not met—bail denied.
2017 PCrLJ 440 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Special Judge (Central) had no authority to delete offences before submission of challan; High Court set aside the order.
2025 YLR 1934
Husband’s failure to explain wife’s death couldn’t justify conviction; prosecution’s unreliable evidence led to acquittal.
PLD 2025 SC 60
Wrong or conflicting legal advice isn’t valid ground for delay; condonation refused and appeal dismissed.
2022 SCMR 2089
Condonation of Delay —For condonation of Delay , each day’s Delay has to be explained with proper justification
2024 S C M R 734
A gift made by an attorney without the donor’s consent is invalid; concurrent courts rightly canceled the unauthorized gift deed.
2023 SCMR 1665
Condonation of delay — Discretionary power of Court — Power to condone the delay and grant an extension of time under section 5 of the of the Limitation Act , is discretionary .
PLD 2025 Lahore 657
PLJ 2025 CrC 550
If the accused is unfit to understand proceedings, the trial court cannot sentence him and must refer the case to the High Court under S.341 Cr.P.C.
Crl.P.L.A.433/2025
Conviction cannot be recorded in absence of evidence of safe custody and transmission of the Narcotic Substances.
Zahid Nawaz v. The State thr. P.G. Punjab and another
Mr. Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar
2025 SCMR 1229
Gift of immovable property must be through a registered deed signed by the donor and attested by two witnesses under S.123 TPA.